“You cried with her?!”
My wife appeared wounded, even a little threatened, when I described my conversation with a female employee. The young woman’s performance had been slipping the past few weeks and the perpetual look of distress on her face suggested problems at home were to blame. The simple question, “How are you?” opened a floodgate of tears as she described feelings of betrayal and despair because of her husband’s behavior. As she wept, I empathized with her pain and shed a few tears of my own. While I maintained strict physical boundaries with my coworker—I didn’t so much as pat her hand—my emotional response to another woman’s anguish triggered a protective instinct within my mate.
Charissa is neither insecure nor suspicious by nature. In fact, she quickly caught herself and recognized that I had simply empathized with the suffering of another person. Nevertheless, her visceral reaction gave me a fleeting glimpse into the mystery of womanhood. And the resulting conversation with my wife became the first step on a journey of discovery in which I learned just how differently men and women experience marital intimacy. Along the way, I also discovered a profound truth that explains why wives consider a man’s viewing pornography nothing short of adultery . . . and why men think they’re overreacting.
For Her, It’s Mind over Matter
Men and women in lasting relationships share four fundamental connections: physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual. However, men and women establish these connections in different order and give them different priority.
Men build monogamy upon a foundation of physical connection. By that, I don’t mean touching, necessarily. Physical connection involves much more. Men need to be physically present with a woman in order to bond with her emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. He wants to be near her, to share time and experiences with her, to see her face and hear her voice, even before touching her for the first time. Physical connection is both primal and primary, which explains why men commonly dismiss long-distance relationships as futile, like having no relationship at all. This is not to suggest that men are fundamentally shallow; they simply experience the deeper aspects of intimacy by means of their physical senses.
Because physical connection comes first, physical connection remains foundational to intimacy. According to Willard Harley, author of the now-classic His Needs Her Needs, the top three relationship necessities for men are sexual fulfillment, recreational companionship, and a pleasing appearance—all sensory in nature.
Women, on the other hand, build monogamy on a foundation of mental connection, which is no less primal or primary than a man’s need to experience his mate through the five senses. In the beginning, when a woman is drawn to a man she finds interesting, she wants to know all about him, his character, his ideas, his interests, his goals. Being in his presence merely serves this need, but letters and long discussions by phone will do just as well. Generally speaking, a woman can tolerate a long-distance romance much better than a man, as long as she continues to experience a rich mental connection with her lover.
It should come as no surprise then, that this mental connection remains foundational to a woman’s experience of intimacy. According to Harley, she needs affection, conversation, and honesty/openness more than anything. While men automatically assume that affection means touching, women think of affection in terms of its mental and emotional significance. A tender note or an unexpected call “just because” are no less meaningful than a hug or a peck on the cheek.
In addition to affection, a wife needs conversation and honesty/openness from her husband. This mental connection to her husband is crucial to her sense of well-being.
To feel secure, a wife must trust her husband to give her accurate information about his past, the present, and the future. What has he done? What is he thinking or doing right now? What plans does he have? If she cannot trust the signals he sends . . . she has no foundation on which to build a solid relationship.
A woman experiences intimacy at its deepest levels when she enjoys complete access to her man’s mind. She feels closest and most secure when she can trust that he holds no secrets from her and when he freely shares his unfiltered, unedited thoughts with her. Even better when she enjoys exclusive access to his innermost self. So, when this connection is broken or violated, the fracture affects the entire foundation of her world.
Making the Connection
Put simply, a direct correlation can be made between physical connection for a man and mental connection for a woman. The truth of this really hit home when I read Shaunti Feldhahn’s For Women Only. In her attempt to explain to women the significance of sex for men, she wrote,
For your husband, sex is more than just a physical need. Lack of sex is as emotionally serious to him as, say, his sudden silence would be to you, were he simply to stop communicating with you. It is just as wounding to him, just as much a legitimate grievance—and just as dangerous to your marriage.
This explains a lot! What the body is to a man, the mind is to a woman. Women treasure mental intimacy like men prize physical intimacy. And just like men expect women to keep their bodies exclusively for them, women expect their men to do the same with their minds.
I am just now beginning to understand what women mean when they say the brain is a sex organ. And I am just now recognizing why a wife feels so betrayed when her husband allows pornography to fondle his mind. She is deeply wounded on at least two levels.
First, pornography violates a wife’s exclusive domain.
Please bear with me as I illustrate the significance of this truth. My purpose is to help men appreciate the anguish women often experience, not to be offensive.
If you are a man, imagine your wife walking through a room full of men. They turn to notice her. Many leer. One reaches out and begins fondling intimate parts of her body. What do you hope she will do?
Every man hopes his wife will consider her body the exclusive domain of her husband, reserved for him alone—his eyes, his hands, his enjoyment—granting access to no other person. He hopes she will be offended, utterly outraged when touched by someone other than her husband. He hopes she will slap the violator’s hand away and then move quickly toward the exit. Every man expects his wife to guard her body from interloping hands, whether he’s present or not.
Now imagine the unthinkable. In response to the man touching her body, she pauses and smiles at him as he continues to grope. Another man sees an opportunity and touches another part of her. She doesn’t respond in kind, but she doesn’t rush for the door, either. In fact, she appears to enjoy the attention.
How do you feel right now?
This is how a woman feels when her husband allows sensual images to grope his mind, her exclusive domain.
Now imagine the additional pain you would experience if, after confronting your wife’s behavior, she justified or rationalized or minimized the incident. Oh, honey, it was harmless. I didn’t do anything in return. Besides, God made me an attractive woman; I can’t help what men try to do. The world is full of men who will try to touch me, should I lock myself away and avoid the whole world? You’re the only one for me, really. That incident didn’t mean anything!
There’s a lot of truth in what she says. She can’t help what a world full of men think or even try to do. Locking herself away isn’t a realistic answer. Perhaps to her it did mean nothing. But none of that is important. The facts are these: It meant something to you; she should care about that. She can’t control the actions of others; however, she can guard her response. She can’t stop men from leering, but she can avoid risky environments. Someday a man might try to touch her inappropriately, but she can slap his hand away and remove herself from the situation.
Sensual images seem less significant, less threatening to men. But not to women. A wife needs to know—not merely by her husband’s words, but by his behavior—that his mind is completely devoted to her. She understands that the world will continue to assault men with sensual images; nevertheless, she wants—no, she needs her man to protect and preserve what belongs to her.
Second, pornography destroys the foundation upon which a wife builds security.
Based on more than twenty years of research and innumerable hours in couples’ therapy, Willard Harley reduced the needs of women to a single word: security.
“A sense of security is the bright golden thread woven through all of a woman’s five basic needs. If a husband does not keep up honest and open communication with his wife, he undermines her trust and eventually destroys her security.”
Pornography is almost always a secret sin, the core element of a hidden other life. When a woman discovers that her husband has been devoting portions of his mind to sexually gratifying images and then closing off those areas to her, the revelation shakes her world to its very foundation. She naturally begins to wonder what other terrible secrets occupy the mind she thought she knew so well. And if she had been so mistaken about knowing her man’s mind, how can she be certain of anything else? Furthermore, his dishonesty destroys her trust, the essential basis of any relationship.
Ironically, when men discover they are victims of adultery, they frequently describe similar thoughts.
Raising the Stakes
While men struggle to understand why women place pornography in the same category with adultery, we must try; or, at the very least, accept the testimony of women at face value. For women, whose intimacy rests upon a foundation of mental connection, the effect of pornography on marriage is very much the same as outright adultery. It destroys intimacy. It betrays trust. And, even when undiscovered, viewing pornography creates emotional distance. In the end, women suffer the same physical, psychological, and spiritual anguish men experience as a result of adultery.
Men, let us always remember that the mind we protect is not ours alone. When we allow an enemy to enter, our mate suffers greater injury than we realize. Therefore, guard your heart with all diligence. Your heart is more than the wellspring of your own life; it is also her fortress.
Photo credit: eivindw
This was amazing, and dead on.. Helped me to better word the emotions I’m feeling, after discovering my husband was watching porn behind my back. Thanks so much ! Peace & blessings 🙏🏽
I have been searching for months for an article that i felt would shed some light on my husbands use of porn. I would like to state right off that the opening statements i think apply more to me then him. I am the man and woman in this article. I almost didnt finish reading this article thinking it was going to lift men up and give them all the reasons as to why they do this. That just by being a man makes it ok for this behavior even if they have a woman who wants and longs for them. Then i continued reading and it just hit on every nail in my heart. When i got married this second time after gruling betrayals from my first husband, i thought this man would be a great change and i opened up my trust and heart to him. Here i am again. Now when we met , me being an open person sexually and mindly we made good connection in the sex department. He had opened up to me that his first wife had found him on porn also. I wrote it off because he had me convinced his wife was a jerk, and i thought we had a good sex life that it wouldn’t be a problem for us. It all changed after we got married and moved to his house. I have seen sides of him that just blows my mind. Like him staring at my daughter who is his step daughter. It was a fluke thing how i found out he was on porn and it immediately changed my opinion of my husband. I confronted him after a few days of being really not nice, then i took a step back after he admitted it and i talked and talked and talked and not meanly , i was always going to him and he not to me. I did alot of reading to research why and what i could do better. Inside i was not understanding and still don’t. At the beginning of this article it talks about how guys want sex, I wanted my husband and he wanted porn over a wife that wanted him. Now i sleep on the couch, don’t wear my rings, and don’t care anymore. I have no desire for him, no desire for sex anymore in general, and my guard as far as trust goes is back up again. If i had the means to walk away i would today. I have tried to make this house a home and after 4yrs don’t feel at all that it is my home still . I have put so much time into it and now i don’t even want to be here. I love this article because it says everything i feel and have been looking for. I don’t think things are going to change for me. I feel it will only get worse instead of better. Once my trust has been broken it’s so hard for me to turn back. But again iwas the man and woman in this article as far as needs go. I don’t see any of the man side in him. Reading so many of the replies just helps so much. In this world of instant gratification with phones and computers, and my husband always on his, i am feeling doomed, disconnected from trust and truth. I love God he has always been with me he lead me to my first husband’s betrayal and now my second husband’s. I truly believe it’s his grace that gets me through my everyday. I also truly believe he is the only one i can put my trust in.
As a counselor, I’m deeply disturbed by your observations that he’s “staring” at your daughter. SAFETY FOR YOUR CHILD MUST BE YOUR PRIMARY CONCERN.
It sounds like your husband is not a safe person for either of you to be around.
Please make sure that your child is safe and leave immediately if you must.
It sounds like your husband had these problems before you met him and has done nothing to resolve them. Given that reality, please make sure that your child is safe and that you are as well.
Peace,
Kay
Saying, women see things this way and men see it that way is also patronizing. That’s like saying, homosexuals see it one way and straight people see it another way (that may be true, but one is wrong). To say, well pedophiles see it this way and the child sees it another way (that’s true too but, one is the victim, the other the pervert). Rapists see it this way and the raped sees it a different way.. How patronizing! It’s evil! This isn’t some fantasy that is played out in your mind, this isn’t a seedy novel with fake characters. These are real people! Jesus didn’t say think about a woman is lusting after her but looking on a woman with the desire for sexual relations! You also bastardize what the just Jesus was saying. This culture always blamed the WOMAN, she was the one being brought for stoning! In the context of the culture it would be more like Jesus to men wanting to throw a woman under the bus for adultery, well, were you looking at pornography?? Then, you are an adulterer already! Let her go!
Ok, I have actually been really shocked, being a Christian my entire life and marrying how this topic could be see as so “grey”. I honestly do not understand, you marry someone promising to be faithful, I’m certain they were your best friend and shared your faith or so you thought. Yet, when sex is involved all the sudden people start being completely selfish and hurtful. I honestly don’t understand it. If a friend was discounting your feelings, betraying your trust and acting unjustly there is no DOUBT what anyone who cares about that person would say. Forgive them and move on with your life lol. To say, anger is murder isn’t what Jesus said, he said, anger at your brother WITHOUT A CAUSE! That’s murder! It’s OK for a person to be ANGRY over injustice! No doubt, men look at pornography out of revenge for not getting their needs met or fear of judgement from their wife for their insecurities. To use pornography because you are too angry to turn to your wife, violates BOTH the heart murder and heart adultery lol. Unjust anger, unjust responses and women DO die inside from the injustice. Pornography is a form of sexual abuse! People get upset over what is called “grooming” of a child victim, winning their trust, putting them in a situation that they are not able maybe financially or emotionally to escape from, fear of exposing because of shame. In a way, Christian men groom their wives, they are religious, nieve, lied to, feel the man is the head of her, maybe not financially secure enough to make it alone, then you find out they wanted you to say “i do” so they could use you as a means of power and exposure to unwanted sexual images is sexual abuse!
I am happy to read more posts discussing this issue; however, I am saddened that rarely do I read articles/blogs about women struggling with this issue. Your comments about the differences between men and women’s emotional/physical needs are spot on – but women struggle with porn just as much as men…it’s just not being discussed.
It’s true that many women also struggle; the stigma is greater for women, though, which means fewer women are talking about it, which means we have less research to use in our posts. If you’re looking for resources for women who struggle, Crystal Renaud and Jessica Harris both offer a ton.
1. The relevance of religion cannot be understated. Surely your studies in philosophy have explored this. One sect of Christianity would have our nature as sinners and another would say Christ manifests in us, as us, through us, and that sin is not part of our true and inherent nature. Both are Christian, each with different interpretations. More pointedly, the judgment of whether or not looking at “sensual images” is a transgression against God (“sin”) really has no basis in supporting the premise that pornography equivocates to adultery and instead undermines credibility across all audiences.
2. Ok. Nevertheless, that you didn’t cut a check for the article doesn’t improve the credibility of the content, given the obvious motivations for your own commerce, and especially the commerce your traffic may generate for the author (direct links to an order page for his book).
3. You cite relevance of mental and emotional disorders as reasons for their exclusion when considering the truthfulness of the premise that viewing pornography is committing adultery. You then shift the focus to “the nature of the act” to support this argument. Perhaps you are right. Let’s run with this for a moment and consider an analogy. In US law, the difference between assault and battery distills down to motive. Assault evaluates intention, and battery only considers the act (intent not required). Your comments are seemingly congruent with the battery analogy (just the nature of act). If we consider the act, and only the act, then the premise that viewing pornography is committing adultery is intrinsically false by way of definition of adultery: “voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse” (dictionary.com). I argue, like you did on your guilt vs. shame article, that acts are not “in a vacuum”. In fact, the author himself draws from context to support his arguments. Had the author cried with his co-worker because they were both wounded with bullets, or cried with her in empathy, is a pertinent detail. There is a sizable and statistically significant population seeking treatment and recovery from pornography use with co-morbid emotional and mental disorders. Emotional and mental disorders matter.
4. Yes, I’m aware. I’ve read many already, thanks. Perhaps it was this line: “Sensual images seem less significant, less threatening to men. But not to women.”, or this one: “What the body is to a man, the mind is to a woman”. The author goes to great lengths to equivocate a husband’s viewing pornography to committing adultery on his wife, and supports the premise entirely based on differences on how each gender “builds monogamy”. That women using porn is “less significant, less threatening” to men is a direct deduction, both within the context of the overall argument as well as when considering the sentence out of context.
5. No thanks. Motive and context have already been belabored. Honestly, humility, candor, accountability, willingness, improvement, effort, dedication, love, commitment to spirit and family, commitment to self and community, and more – all these are components in recovery. The absence of these components, or the spiritual and emotional depth of them color “the act”. Every committed couple working through this can attest to this truth.
6. You essentially admit that the motive of the author for making this equivocation was to be offensive to men. Back to credibility.
7. This is where we agree to disagree. There is an enormous body of academic research, empirical and anecdotal evidence, and proven treatment modalities that consider shame to be the single largest contributor to fueling escalating pornography use. Attachment disorders, intimacy challenges, it’s all the same rhythm: shame. The reaction to shame IS the emphasis. If the reaction to shame is to evacuate it on another by shaming them, or to rage, or to deny and dismiss, or commit shame-based acts, whatever it is, it’s the reaction that’s the tell-tale to work with. Changing the reaction is the goal. I’d argue that deliberate attempts to offend men on pornography use is using shame as a means of persuasion. This is the most disturbing message in this article and the reason I took the time to respond.
1. I suppose we will agree to disagree here. Of course his Christian worldview colors all he sees, but so does everyone’s worldview. Everyone has their presuppositions. The question is whether they are true to them (and I believe the author is here).
2. Sure. Why not?
3. Sure they matter. I agree completely. I never said they didn’t matter. I merely am saying that ethics don’t boil down to motive alone. The point of this author’s article is to argue why many women feel betrayed by a partner watching porn the way they feel betrayed by a partner having sex with another woman, or as he says, “place pornography in the same category with adultery.” Women are looking at both the nature of the act and the motive behind the act, not just one or the other.
4. I don’t disagree that the author’s statements fall flat to those who disagree with his equivocations, but there are many who agree (namely many women who have felt the pain he describes). Perhaps you will have to agree to disagree with them.
5. I don’t disagree and I’m still not sure why you think I would.
6. Yes. It was to offend a man’s sensibilities that he can treat his porn use as a trivial matter, but I’m not sure why that goes to his credibility.
7. I think we were firing over each other’s heads here. What you are calling “shame” I am calling “a reaction to shame.” Once you switch the labels around I agree with you completely (at least, in so far as you have explained yourself).
On credibility, the author of the article is clearly religious. The placement of the article is on a commercial website that sells software designed to block or record pornography viewing. I wonder if covenant eyes paid for this article and the contents of it.
Notice no mention of mental disorders, like PTSD, biploar, depression, or anxiety? Notice no mention of women engaging in pornography (which, by the article, implies that husbands’ would view wife’s use of pornography as less significant of injury, and, for that matter, not one of the husband’s realms of “ownership and control”). Notice no mention of context on slips, recovery, intention, or progress? Notice no mention of actual adulterous injury (children, venereal diseases, emotional relationships, etc)? Notice no mention that honesty is also a man’s need?
Anyone catch the logical deduction behind ‘body is to man as mind is to woman’? Here it is: men value looks more than intellect/spiritual fitness/her brain/her emotions/her connection/everything. What a devaluing reduction of men.
I think the most insidious deduction from this article is the implication that committing a single act of adultery is no more harmful to a wife than a single act of looking at pornography is. I don’t know a single wife who would believe their husband’s slip to looking at pornography was just as violating as, say, him having sex with his ex-lover or soliciting a prostitute.
The phrase “ownership and control” was borrowed from the definition of word “domain”. I believe the spirit of the article is to validate the feelings many women have to their husband/partner’s use of pornography. The language doesn’t address one of the primary, if not sole, components behind pornography: shame. Feeling ashamed for slipping, yet once again, to viewing pornography is only aggravated by the notion that webpages like this pile it on with the judgement that you just committed actual adultery.
1. You assume the religion of the author undermines his credibility, correct? Why is that?
2. We did not pay for the article, no. The author is a long-time advocate for our company.
3. As far as mental disorders go, you are right. The author didn’t mention them. But they are hardly relevant to the specific question at hand. Those underlying conditions just become part of the reason behind the activity. This article speaks more to the nature of the act, not to the specific motives behind the act. (And yes, motives should matter, of course, it just wasn’t in the scope of this specific article.)
4. We have many articles here about women using porn. If you’d like to read some, I suggest going here. I’m not sure why you think the absence of this angle implies a woman using porn is less serious. Can you explain?
5. If you want some good articles about slips and recovery and such, we have some great material on that. I suggest this one and this one as good places to start.
6. As far his “insidious deduction” goes, I see exactly what you’re talking about. As I read back through the article, it seems the intention is to address the stupid excuses men make for watching porn, somehow trying to lessen the impact of its seriousness, and the author’s mode of doing this is to compare it to a scenario that would offend a man’s sensibilities, not compare it to another method of committing adultery. If you would prefer an article with the other angle, you can go here.
7. You are absolutely correct that shame is a major component of the problem. I do object, however, to the idea that shame is somehow the enemy here. When it comes to shame, I believe there are (at least) two issues that needs to be addressed. First is someone’s personal reaction to the feeling of shame. Second is how others use shame to leverage power over others. Both need to be addressed. If calling using porn “adultery” is merely a power play, a way to try to lock someone in chronic shame, this is poisonous to a relationship and should be stopped.
You can divorce on ANY grounds. That is not what the problem is in scriptures. The problem is REMARRIAGE. The only divorce that allows remarriage is adultery.
So, you would take the position that the Bible allows for civil divorces, but remarriage is only allowed in one specific circumstance: in the instance of adultery. Do you think that this encompasses other forms of sexual perversion, or that is limited to merely physical adultery?
I totally agree with what has been said here because I used to be addicted to pornography and at first it seemed harmless but after awhile I was indulging more and more my thoughts became very disturbing and it became much harder to keep my mind clean and I could no longer look at women with respect I just saw them as objects. I have since recovered from this terrible addiction and I use the word “recovered” because pornography addiction is basically like a plague that slowly seeps through the cracks in your brain and eventually corrupts your heart but I see a difference now, I am happier, I don’t feel the insurmountable urge to seek out porn anymore, and I feel much more fulfilled in my life etc… my point being don’t succumb to porn because lust is an unsatisfiable thing it only drives you to want more and more and it soon completely consumes you and ruins your whole life.
Its not and its not a sin its normal if its used in self-control way once or twice a week
What makes you say it isn’t a sin? What is the basis of a person claiming something is “sinful” or not sinful, in your opinion?