There is no end to the groups available for porn addicts and sex addicts. The five major groups based on the 12-step method are SA, SAA, SLAA, SCA, and SRA. All of these sexual addiction recovery groups have adapted the famous 12 Steps to their purposes, but there are some underlying differences among them.
Why participate in a 12-step group?
12-step groups are essential a type of accountability group. The 12-step model is one of the most well-known and successful methods for overcoming addiction.1 This model for recovery originated with Alcoholics Anonymous, and millions of people have found freedom through it.
The same principles have been successfully applied to other unwanted behaviors, including sex addiction and pornography addiction. Since pornography addiction typically forms in isolation, people who overcome it need a supportive community. Finding the right support group for porn addiction can be the difference between success and failure.
What are the differences between these groups?
After some correspondence with a few volunteers from these groups, this is the best understanding I have about their distinctiveness.
SA: Sexaholics Anonymous
This group is for people who feel powerless over lust. SA’s standard of sexual sobriety is total celibacy except with a marriage partner. According to the SA website, for the sexaholic, “any form of sex with one’s self or with partners other than the spouse is progressively addictive and destructive. We also see that lust is the driving force behind our sexual acting out, and true sobriety includes progressive victory over lust.”
SA was the first sexual recovery fellowship to emerge in the 1970s. It was founded by an AA member in southern California who was cheating on his wife and worked to adapt the 12 Steps for a sexual recovery setting.
SAA: Sex Addicts Anonymous
This group is for people who feel powerless over addictive sexual behavior, focusing more on acting out sexually. The SAA website states that a sex addict realizes “we were powerless over our sexual thoughts and behaviors and that our preoccupation with sex was causing progressively severe adverse consequences for us, our families, and our friends.”
SAA was founded by therapist Patrick Carnes as a place to refer his patients after their stay at Golden Valley. Carnes drafted the original “green book” for SAA. The group tends to his philosophy that sex addiction is a behavioral disease as opposed to a moral failing. Their members define their own sexual boundaries with the guidance of their sponsors and other group members. They encourage members to discover and explore what healthy sexuality means to them.
SCA: Sexual Compulsives Anonymous
This group is for people who feel powerless over having compulsive sex. According to the SCA website, “Our primary purpose is to stay sexually sober and to help others to achieve sexual sobriety.” Further, it states, “We believe we are not meant to repress our God-given sexuality, but to learn how to express it in ways that will not make unreasonable demands on our time and energy, place us in legal jeopardy, or endanger our mental, physical or spiritual health.”
SCA was founded by homosexual men in LA and New York who wanted a place to share openly about their sexual behaviors. In many places, SCA attracts mostly gay men. It advertises being “inclusive of all sexual orientations, open to anyone with a desire to recover from sexual compulsion.”
SLAA: Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous
This group is for people who feel powerless over sex and love addiction. According to the SLAA website, this includes “love addiction, relationship, and sexual anorexia.” They tend to look at both the physical and emotional components of addiction.
SLAA was founded by a man in Boston whose own story reflected a considerable amount of relationship obsession. This fellowship, by and large, attracts more of those whose addictive life reflects this same pattern.
. . . .
SRA: Sexual Recovery Anonymous
This group is for people who feel powerless over sexual obsessions. For SRA, “sobriety includes freedom from masturbation and from sex outside a mutually committed relationship.”
SRA was founded in New York and LA by singles who like SA’s philosophy but disagree with the idea that one needs to be married before one has sex.
Christian Groups Modeled After 12-Steps
Step approaches to addiction recovery are common today, but the famous 12 Steps are not the only model. These models have different numbers of steps but employ many of the same principles. Here are two popular groups:
1 Donovan, D. M., Ingalsbe, M. H., Benbow, J., & Daley, D. C. (2013). 12-step interventions and mutual support programs for substance use disorders: an overview. Social work in public health, 28(3-4), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2013.774663
12-step groups teach two things which I tend to vehemently disagree with. (1) The addict is selfish to the core (this is patently false for me, for when using or not using I have always been very giving, almost to a fault). (2) Without God, the group, total devotion to service and other rigid requirements, the addict, who is *POWERLESS* is condemned either to death or life in institutions or jails (or just a life of constant pain or misery). I find the selfish/selfless dichotomy and the “powerless” teaching of 12-step programs to have a palpable cult-like feel to them, because they imply that total group reliance is essential for not just recovery but for survival.
With regard to churches struggling to offer recovery groups for sex addicts and their partners – here’s a beautiful blog posting by my old counselor Lauri (http://www.aprocessofbecoming.blogspot.com/search/label/sexuality) she has a lot to say about God, life and even the church. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Christian woman so clearly articulate the God given gift of sex…most Christian men and woman can’t even talk about sex out loud. You have to heal your own sexual pain and shame before you can tell others how to do it: See the “Manifesto of God and Sex” below.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
A Manifesto of God & Sex
A friend asked recently if it was possible to be a Christian and a “luscious,” sexual being at the same time. I knew exactly what my answer was to her in the moment, but I didn’t quite have the words to flesh it out. The following is my attempt to do so.
First, you should know that there’s a lot to say about this subject. I’ll barely skim the surface here. There are volumes of beliefs and work between each line that follows. It’s complex, and yet it’s simple. I offer the simple version here. A confession of what I believe about God, sex, and the bond between the two, which is Love.
I believe in Love.
I believe that God is Love.
I believe that Jesus’ choice to use his power & privilege
to give himself to others –
mind, body, & soul –
is the truest embodiment of Love.
I believe in Sex.
I believe that we are all created to be beautiful, luscious, sexual beings.
I believe that sexual contact is one of the deepest forms of human connection
and that our capacity to give & receive Love is most evident via sexual expression.
I believe that the best, mind-blowing, earth-shattering, pleasure-filled sex
comes when we are able to give ourselves completely to another –
mind, body, & soul.
Sex that flows from Love is
anything but mild and polite.
It generates more heat and arousal than many of us dares to experience.
It is in the heat of sexual Love that we encounter God –
not the sterile, white, narcissistic God that many of us were falsely raised to know,
but the sensual, playful, loving God
who had the passion and humor to create our eyes…
lips… necks… fingertips… breasts… torsos…
penises… and clitorises…
in the first place.
Culturally, we’re told that Love kills sexual pleasure and that
novelty and consumption are the keys to intense arousal.
This is a lie.
There is pleasure in novelty and consumption,
but it is shallow and brief.
And it causes harm to us,
because it cuts us off from Love.
The problem is that
most of us are afraid of Love.
We want it, and we are scared of the pain
we might feel if we truly give ourselves to another.
Because of that fear,
we twist Love, and we twist sex.
We let corrupt versions of God & sex
define how we interact with & embody both.
This is not Love.
This is Fear.
And we mustn’t confuse the two.
The way that Jesus Loved is truly compelling to me.
He teaches me how to give myself completely to others
despite the fear that tries to hold me back
and the subsequent pain (i.e., crucifixion) that will come
at one point or another.
But fear and pain are not the point,
and they do not have to have
the final power over us.
Love is the point
and the profound pleasure that it brings
to help us be in our bodies in this world
and simultaneously transcend it.
When my friend asked if it was possible to be
a Christian and a “luscious,” sexual being at the same time,
I gave an enthusiastic “Yes!”
And I told her not only that I think it’s possible, but
it’s because of my faith that I can be the luscious, sexual being
that God created me to be.
What a quirky, playful God that gave us these
luscious, sensual bodies –
all to help us know Love.
Amen?
Amen.
Thanks for this interesting thread. I attend a meeting called Prodigals International in the Seattle area. It is a 12-step group, but fully Christ-centered. I just wish that everyone in the church had a chance to work through the steps with a mentor. I have never found the same level of honesty and humility as among my fellow addicts. I’m afraid the church neither provides the opportunity or encouragement for rigorous, unsparing honesty. But that is the cornerstone of our faith, isn’t it?
Surprising there is an emergence of faith base addiction groups, and they are good at providing unparalleled support. However, many are shy about sex addiction. For the few where the program exists, their acceptance of sex addiction is even questionable.
@Champs – I believe sex addiction received widespread acceptance in many faith-based groups. One only needs to look at pioneering Christian organizations in this area. For example, Mark Laaser’s Faithful and True or Heart to Heart Counseling Center.
@Luke G (response to Champs) –
I used the Faithful and True workbook in one of the For Men Only programs that I attended. And it was a valuable part of my recovery. But that FMO program, and that text, were not enough to get me sober.
It is wonderful that Laaser has a program in Minnesota (or wherever) but that does little for the millions of men in other states. The fact that I have about 30 SA meetings in the Portland (OR) area is a blessing that can be (and is being) duplicated around the country.
It is a terrible sadness that 12-step programs are denigrated when so many churches offer nothing in their place.
Thanks for all the responses to my comment. Trisha, I need to clarify what I said, and thanks so much for keeping me honest. When I said that churches should not send people to 12-step groups, I really meant secular groups. If you have a group that is Christ and gospel-centered, then that is exactly what I’m endorsing.
As John pointed out, we really do need support groups, and the church should be at the forefront of facilitating just that. Glad to see in the disagreements that we’re actually in concert here.
Brian
I’d like to comment on Brian’s three points.
Point #1 – The fact is, people in recovery from sexual/pornography addiction NEED a support group. Just confessing to a pastor is not enough. Even getting counseling is not enough, although it may be necessary. A central component of sex addiction is secrecy and the fear of being known by our peers. The only way to deal with that is to have a safe place to talk about it openly, and a support group is the only place to find others who have been where you’ve been. So, if a church doesn’t want to send people to a 12-step group, they had better be ready to start their own support group or find other local churches who have them to send people to.
Point #2 – I am a recovering sex addict with 13 years of sobriety. I found recovery in a Christian support group that was not 12-step based. However, a very close friend of mine found recovery in a 12-step group because his church was unwilling to help him. His recovery would rival the very best of men who found recovery in a “Christian” support group. He found Christ in a 12-step group and is very defensive when people say 12-step is not Christ-centered. If there are not GOOD Christian support groups in your area, why would you not send people to a 12-step program?
Point #3 – Yes, the church does need to address sexual purity. From what I see, sexual purity may be the highest “per capita” sin in the church today, yet many churches won’t address it. So, people continue to pretend that they have no problems, adding to the power of secrecy in this addiction.
No, 12-step is not perfect, but neither is any Christian recovery program I’ve seen, and in 13 years I’ve been through most of them, including Celebrate Recovery. In many cases, the local SA group may be the strongest program in your region. We cannot ignore these as Christians, especially until we collectively step up to the plate and start offering quality recovery groups for sex addicts in every region.
We in Courage utilize the 12-steps approach together with our goals.
I feel I must respectfully disagree with you some on point #2. Being at the CCEF conference, I felt one of the major themes of the entire conference was the point that as counselors/people helpers that we need to realize we are also fallen sinful individuals. This allows us to find a point of similarity between ourselves and those individuals we are counseling.
Furthermore, from both a Biblical standpoint and a counseling standpoint I do not think it’s healthy for a person who struggles with lust /pornography /illicit sex to continue to associate their identity with being an “addict.” Just as it is not good for a person who struggles with anorexia to self identify as an “anorexic.” I think the better terminology and self descriptors for a Christian would be: I am a redeemed individual who struggles with X sin.
Regarding “I am Gordon and I am a sexaholic”:
I am looking forward to meeting the person who has struggled with lust like I have and who is now totally free of it. In the meantime, I find no problem whatsoever accepting BOTH that I am a redeemed Son of the King, and that I have a deep and abiding addiction to lust.
As it says in the Big Book: “We are not cured of alcoholism [sexaholism]. What we really have is a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of our spiritual condition. Every day is a day when we must carry the vision of God’s will into all of our activities.”
I will be a sexaholic to the day I die, but that doesn’t negate my status as a saint anymore than it means that I am in active addiction.
Luke,
On your response to #1 – I think it’s critical to create a climate where sin can be talked about, and the best way to do that is for church leaders to talk about their own struggles, temptations, and even failures. It has to start with the leadership. I have noticed that many respected church leaders have been quite open with the fact that it’s a temptation for them, like John Piper, George Verwer, and Mark Driscoll. This paves the way for openness.
#2 – one of the things that always bothered me when I went to SA and SAA was the self-identification as a sex addict (Hi, I’m Brian, and I’m a sex addict). That’s not what Scripture says. The Bible teaches that I am redeemed and have Christ’s righteousness, in spite of presenting sin. Theology leads to thinking and thinking leads to practice. If I believe what God says about me, I can live what God says about me. This is lacking in those groups.
#3 – In some churches when somebody confesses a porn problem, they are immediately sent to a 12-step group, or a counselor. The latter may be warranted in some cases, but for most having accountability and confession, and a focus on relationships and growth in Christ is all they really need. Churches need to facilitate this.
I have to confess that I posted the previous response because I’m speaking on this topic at the Xenos Summer Institute next week, and was fishing for feedback on that position. Of course, I will be recommending Covenant Eyes as part of the solution, and I’m grateful to God for your software.
On #1 – Absolutely! Leadership must take the reigns on this.
On #2 – I see what you mean about that, and you are right that right theology must always take precedence over ritualistic/traditional jargon. (On the other hand I was at the CCEF “The Addict in Us All” conference last year. It was interesting when Tim Lane opened the whole thing with “Hi, I’m Tim, and I’m an addict.” His point was to show that all of us are in fact still self-addicts, that all sin is driven by this fleshly, fallen preoccupation with self and not God. It’s one thing to assert our oneness to Christ as the primary thing that defines us, its another thing to stress our new identity to a point where we ignore our fleshly tendencies. Still, I agree with you. Paul said it was no longer him that was doing that which he hated but “the sin in me.”)
On #3 – Amen to that.
In general my point for this post is that there are a lot of 12-step sex addiction groups out there and I thought that very curious. The point was to merely point out the differences.
PS: Do you want me to mail you some CE fliers for your presentation? I’d be happy to do send you free stuff to give out if you are interested.
With all due respect to the good that these groups do in the community at large, I believe that for Christians, the church should interact more fully with people struggling with sexual addiction. I would cite 3 reasons for this:
1. It moves confession outside the realm of the Body of Christ. Men (and women) who have issues with pornography might never confess to their brothers, and miss out on receiving grace and help from those in their church.
2. 12-step groups are not God-centered, Christ-centered, gospel-centered groups. For all the good these groups may do, there is no real change apart from the gospel working in the life of the believer.
3. The church needs to address all of the life of the believer, including sexual brokenness.
I would be interested in any feedback on these points.
Brian, I totally agree with you: Christians should be interacting with those who struggle with sex addiction. Unfortunately #1 is true. Men and women don’t feel free to confess sin in the church, especially when it comes to this area. You’re right on #2 as well. I remember Nate Larkin writing about this in his book, Samson and the Pirate Monks. He went to 12-step groups amidst his recovery for years, and yet he struggled with the non-Christian nature of the groups. You are also right on #3 – if the church doesn’t address the social issues of our time, how sin is manifesting itself all around us, we cease to show how Christ is a full and sufficient Savior from all kinds of sin.
I used to have a similarly low opinion of 12-step programs – but my experience in SA has been so life-giving that I can never be sufficiently grateful for the gift I have been given there.
As it says in the White Book (adapted from the Big Book): “…we deal with lust — cunning, baffling, powerful! Without help it is too much for us. But there is One who has all power — that One is God. May you find Him now!”
I attended Baptist churches since I was on the cradle roll. Other than my years in college, I have been at church nearly every week – at least once a week – for nearly six decades. By the time I was in high school, I knew all of the answers (Christ died for my sins, repentance, raised to new life, etc, etc, etc). And in the past 15 years I have been reaching out over and over again at church, confessing my addiction and looking for others to walk with me. Most of the men (and pastors) have pretty much ignored me. A few men have been somewhat helpful, but they cannot speak from experience with any addictive disorders and generally left me feeling more defeated and questioning my salvation.
I also attended groups like For Men Only at nearby churches, where I got more consistent help — to say nothing of more relevant help. But it still was not enough for me to find sobriety (purity). I eventually reached the depth of despair where I was seriously planning my suicide. This got me involved with the medical (mental health) community. The anti-depressants helped my moods and my ability to set aside suicidal thoughts — but I was still helpless to deal with my addictive behavior.
My wife is disappointed that I have been attending SA for three years now, confident that I would find more help with the “truth” that is available in a more explicitly Christian context. But talking to (and especially working with) people who understand my addiction from the inside has made all the difference in the world.
It would be easy for me to label my church family as spiritually shallow, glossing over the deep meaning of the Gospel and Grace. It would be equally easy for me to say that they probably all have it clear but were never able to discern my deep lack of understanding of these words. But I don’t think that either of these is the appropriate diagnosis of my spiritual history. Even if the latter is true, I don’t know how it could have been different to lead me to the truth that God has shown me in SA.
Quite frankly, it is only in the context of SA that I finally started to understand the meaning of so many words that I have been able to define for decades. It was first at SA that the astonishing, scandalous wonder of GRACE became clear to me. I am eternally grateful for the spiritual growth that I have had in SA — which I never found in 5 decades of attendance at a half dozen churches and countless para-church activities and programs.
I don’t feel like I have expressed myself very well, but I pray that someone who is struggling may find hope from my experience.
I think 12-Step programs have helped many many people. Often the flavor of any local group will be guided my the people who are involved in it. So when the people are striving to be gospel-centered, the 12-Step model they use will probably be infused with it. Thanks for sharing, Gordon!
I disagree, primarily because I have been in a 12 step oriented sex addict recovery program for 3 years and the 12 steps are greatly centered around our higher power; which in my experience is majority recognized as God. I attend atleast 4 meetings per week and honestly cannot think of one that God is not mentioned in. Furthermore, I also have attended my church based CR and it to is a wonderful program offering biblical focus to many diseases. But it only runs once per week and the majority of addicts I know, need more meetings and fellowship to stay sober. Thanks!
On number 2 the Bible also teaches, if your eye offends you pluck it out. It seems that so many people who post on sites like these are not addicts but do have all the answers. I grow weary of what “authority” they express over something inwhich they have no knowledge except what they learned from a pulpit. 12 step participants view themselves as someone with a disease which 12 step programs help them manage. Most people with diabetes will have it for their entire lives. Calling themselves diabetic makes them no less special in the eyes of God. Anyone with a legitimate study of any addictive condition can see the clear similarity. I have not plucked out my own eye and I have never met anyone who has. Does that make us all double sinners? 12 step programs assist us in living healthier lives and “sinning no more.” The act is the sin and as we stop acting out we stop that sinful experience. The diabetic is still a diabetic after giving up the Sugar. I am a grateful sexaholic because the 12 step program brought me closer to God and I no longer act out. It is the program that helps me maintain my sobriety and I benefit in nothing by those who make me wrong for acknowledging the truth of who I am, a grateful recovering sexaholic.
I think there needs to be some give and take here. The Bible itself uses the disease metaphor when talking about sin. Look at texts like Isaiah 1:5-7 and 53:6. Scripture emphasizes that sin has many things in common with a disease. Like a disease, sin affects our entire being, it is painful, it leads to death, and it is absolutely tragic.
Moreover, sin as a disease isn’t just a metaphor. In 1 Corinthians 6:18, Paul writes, “Every other sin a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body.” There is a sense in which sexual sin is unique in the damage it does to the body. Paul writes that slavery to sin does not just stem from the heart, but it is something that finds a beachhead in the very members of our physical bodies. “So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand. For I delight in the law of God, in my inner being, but I see in my members another law waging war against the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members” (Romans 7:21-23, italics added). Sin, in a very real sense, makes us sick.
However, the Bible never loses sight of moral responsibility. Alcoholism and porn addiction are a lot like diseases. They feel as if we have been taken over by a virus, making us spiral out of control…but it is voluntary slavery.
Dr. Ed Welch calls this the dual nature of sin:
Just like the Bible, as Christians we can and should speak of slavery to porn as a sickness, but a sickness we have chosen. Disease is a good metaphor for sin, but it is not the only metaphor.
Your comment about 12 step groups not being God centered or Christ centered, etc., is incorrect. We speak of the God of our understanding and a higher power. Is it so important that we split hairs over whether one says God, Christ, Jesus, higher power, etc? God will be God and do what God does, in all grace and compassion, for anyone seeking and asking – in a 12 step group or otherwise.
By the way, I was raised in a Christian home and in Christian churches for 40 years. The real healing from addiction began for me in 12 step programs. That’s where I found God. And freedom from compulsive behaviors.
As much as the “Church” wants to address the issues of addictive and compulsive behaviors (gambling, sexaholics, alcoholics, addicts, etc.) within their congregations and communities, they haven’t been able to successfully do so because there is judgment and the need to be perfect – The church is ashamed to be human! You can say that it’s not there, but that’s what families say who are in denial about their own problems. Churches would be better to say, we have judged others, forgive us. But at this time, about the best they can do is offer to rent their basements to these groups.
There are good things in most churches and good people. Leadership needs to attend open 12 step groups to learn how to bring the concepts into their churches to help heal their people. And congregants should be encouraged to attend at least 6 meetings, maybe more if they are really committed to ministering to the hurting and addicted.
The key is humility and a willingness to keep an open mind…perhaps God is doing a new thing (as he always is) and the Church needs to get on board.
And please, over the years I’ve attended 4 different types of 12 step programs. Please do not say that these groups are not God centered. You are right in the sense that people are NOT told what to believe about God. What a beautiful thing, huh? They are actually allowed to find the God of their understanding. There’s a difference in a personal God of your understanding and one for which you are told what/how/why to believe. I’ll take the personal God every day. Thanks for reading this.
I struggled with sex and love addiction, went to friends in the church, pastors, Bible school teachers, Christian therapists, deliverance ministries… There was some help, but not total victory. The one good thing about the SA group is I can confess ANYTHING and not feel judged. This doesn’t’ happen in any church I know of. Everyone is afraid to take off their mask. Without the ability to take off the mask, you think no one knows you and therefore no one loves you. For if they really knew you, they would reject you.
It was a safe place to recover, the confession of sins and struggles help break the hold they had over me. Gradually I saw things that fed my addiction: resentment, pride, objectification, using pornography for comfort, fantasy, etc.
The missing component of SA is there is no prayer after confession resulting in healing. You share, you are now vulnerable, and left hanging.
Also the confession: I am a Sexaholics is not scriptural. Paul tells me I am a new creation, regardless of behavior, feelings, etc. this reality has secured a firm foundation against the lies of the enemy.
I will use the 3 parts that you put in and then go over them from a perspective of a church in southwest Ohio.
1. It moves confession outside the realm of the Body of Christ. Men (and women) who have issues with pornography might never confess to their brothers, and miss out on receiving grace and help from those in their church.
There are two groups that go on at the exact same times for the men who are addicted to alcohol, sex, lust, porn, and drugs. They do follow the 12 steps as well as the “Big Book” that is often quoted. The higher power in this group has always been referred to as God. Scriptures are used to back things up and most men had been in a church their entire lives. The meetings are held in classrooms and all are welcome to join in or pass.
The second group is made up of women, many of which their husbands are in the first group. Everything that is mentioned in the room stays in the room and all the names are also confidential.
2. 12-step groups are not God-centered, Christ-centered, gospel-centered groups. For all the good these groups may do, there is no real change apart from the gospel working in the life of the believer.
Like I stated above, the 12 step can be and is in many places using scripture to walk through, The reason is that they took the 12 step book and had a pastor who had been an addict, took everything to task and brought in the scriptures. The lead pastor also had much to do with the redesign of the curriculum as well.
3. The church needs to address all of the life of the believer, including sexual brokenness.
Amen to that, Not all churches have the capabilities to handle these kind of problems and rely on other Bible based organizations like “Teen Challenge” which is very intense.
I am also working with 2 elders with my addiction as well.They have assigned that I read the book “Strengthen Yourself in the Lord: How to Release the Hidden Power of God in Your Life” By Bill Johnson.
Your point 2 could not be further from the truth. In SA literature there is a quote “Find God or die”. Steps 2,3, 5, 6,7 and 11 help us see there is a God and we didn’t get the job, acknowledge and ask God to help us remove character flaws or shortcomings, share with God and another human being the exact nature of our wrongs, seek through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understand Him. Sadly, the Christian army is one of the first to shoot their wounded. I cannot count the times I have heard guys seeking help state how, “brothers” told them they were not praying the right kind of prayers or they were not praying hard enough because they were not delivered from their obsession. It really can’t get any more shaming as this and drives the addicted deeper within themselves. I think you mean well but need to do more research into this addiction and hope you have over the past 10 years.
You should also include Celebrate Recovery. Many (most?) of the CR programs have small groups for pornography and sexual addiction and deal with it from a Christian perspective both with the Christ-centered Twelve Steps and the Eight Principles of Recovery. Our church’s group has been thriving for over six years.
I can’t say I have experienced that in our local CR groups. CR seems more like a generalized one size fits all group lacking the intimacy and safety needed for dealing with our sexual secrets.